Monday, April 8, 2013

The dreaded "C" word.


Oral, Head & Neck Cancer Awareness Month

 

Is oral cancer common?

-Approximately 42,000 people in the U.S. will be newly diagnosed with oral cancer this year. As you are well aware, dentists are often the first line of defense against oral cancer, through the process of early discovery. (Oral Cancer Foundation, 2013)

 

Early detection is critical

-Majority of oral cancers are detected in later stages of cancer leading to a high death rate. Published studies show that currently less than 15% of those who visited a dentist regularly, reported having had an oral cancer screening. (Oral Cancer Foundation, 2013) At Nicollet Mall Dental Arts, we preform an oral cancer screening at every preventive appointment.

 

Who is at risk?

-Most people come to oral cancer by two distinct pathways.

 

1.     Though the use of tobacco and alcohol.

2.     Exposure to the HPV-16 virus (human papilloma virus version 16) HPV is a newly identified etiology, and the same one which is responsible for the vast majority of cervical cancers in women.

 

A small percentage of people, fewer than 7%, get oral cancers from no currently identifiable cause. It is currently believed that these are likely related to some genetic predisposition. (Oral Cancer Foundation, 2013).

 

Please view the following clips about oral cancer.


 


 

Thursday, February 28, 2013

"Hey Sugar !"





The Tooth and Nothing but the Tooth

Megan Arnold, DH, BSDH, MA

February is National Children's Dental Health Month!!

Dental caries (cavities) is still the most prevalent chronic infectious disease in children, affecting over one-quarter of U.S. children under five years of age!!!

 

 

Regular dental visits, good oral hygiene, and a healthy diet can help prevent cavities

 

 

Do you know how much sugar is in some common beverages?

Take a look…….

 








 

 

 

 

 

 


Friday, January 18, 2013

Why are X-rays necessary?













January 2013



Why are X-rays necessary?
Megan Arnold, RDH, BSDH, MA

 

In the past few months, I have heard some of our patients express concerns about the safety and efficacy of dental X-rays and I want to shed some light and scientific data on the subject.  

Dental radiographs, commonly called X-rays, provide valuable information to the dentist that may not otherwise be accessible based on a visual examination alone, such as decay between the teeth and under fillings; cracks and other damage; periodontal disease; abscesses, infections or cysts; and developmental abnormalities. Additionally, radiographs are a useful tool to treatment plan procedures such as implants, orthodontics and dentures. Radiographs show disease early enough for a problem to be addressed, treated and cured.

Dr. Uppgaard follows guidelines provided by the American Dental Association (ADA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) when prescribing dental radiographs (X-rays). He treats each patient as an individual and bases his recommendations on that patient's needs, risk factors such as present oral health, risk for cavities, age/state of growth and development, periodontal status, and signs and symptoms of oral disease.
 
Below is a table which compares dental X-rays to other forms of radiation. Note the normal background radiation for an average day is 0.01 mSv.  1 - 4 dental x rays exposes humans to less than 1 day's worth of natural radiation.  A full mouth series of radiographs is equivalent to a 5 hour plane ride. Look at the amount of radiation one receives during a mammogram or CAT scan. Often,  people will have these taken without a second thought. 

We cannot emphasize enough the importance, in medical and dental decisions, of weighing risk vs. benefit.  Many things can be discovered with dental radiographs that cannot be found any other way.  Yes, there is risk in subjecting oneself to radiation, but as the table shows the radiation amounts in dentistry are very, very low;  thus the risk of ill effects is very, very low.  The benefits of taking x rays can be great; instead of being unaware of deep decay which leads to a root canal and crown a filling may be placed, tumors are discovered in their infant stages, nerve problems are found before a debilitating abscess occurs, and so on.

Occasionally we have patients who refuse x rays.  In listening to their reasons we oftentimes hear that they had heard or read  that x rays were "bad for you".  We  encourage those who do so to examine carefully the facts.  Unlike a poorly done scientific study or poorly researched news article, the facts do not lie.

The final note about radiographs is we cannot treat patients without having made a proper diagnosis.  Being we are responsible for your oral health we are medically and legally required to use the means we have available to do so.  Not taking radiographs when they are indicated, besides potentially resulting in harm to the patient due to a missed diagnosis, may also be regarded as malpractice.  The standard of dental  care, in Minnesota, includes the taking of necessary x rays.  In other words we are required, medically and legally, to take necessary x rays for all of our patients.  If a patient continues to refuse our recommendations we, unfortunately,  must dismiss that patient from our practice.












 
 
Common Sources of Radiation

Sources
Estimated Exposure
Comparable to Natural Background radiation (Estimated)
Natural Occurring Radiation (Natural Background Radiation) for the average person in the United States
3.0 mSv
0.01 mSv
1 year
1 day
5 hour airplane flight
0.023 mSv (at 0.005 mSv per   hour in the air)
 3 days
Mammogram
0.042 mSv
50 days
Chest X-ray
0.1 mSv
10 days
CT Scan – Whole Body
10.0 mSv
3 years
Dental X-ray – single BWX or PA
                      -- 4 BWX
                      -- FMX
 
0.001 mSv
0.004 mSv
0.02  mSv
 
Less than 1 day
Less than 1 day
2 days
 
Note: All figures are average values. Actual values may vary
 
 

- Colgate Oral and Dental Health Resources, 2012

- American Dental Association, 2012

- U.S Department of Human and Health Services, 2012

- U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2012